Monthly Archives: January 2010

The Big Picture on Haiti

No one does photojournalism better than The Big Picture from See for yourself.

About these ads

Why is Haiti so poor?

The blog Marginal Revolution asks the question and provides some possible answers.  But don’t just read the post: read the comments. The comments provide alot more ideas on the difficulties that Haiti has faced over the centuries, and I thought they were better than the original post.

As for Haiti, the saying “if it’s not one thing, it’s another” certainly applies to this country and the people who live there. 

Haiti and the architecture of despair

Girl crying in front of a building after the January 2009 Earthquake

Girl crying in front of a building after the January 2010 Earthquake

Among the many good articles the NYTimes has on Haiti is this one: Flawed Building Likely a Big Element – One of the likely reasons that there will be so many deaths in Haiti will have to do with the architecture of their buildings. The quality of the buildings are constrained by the  cost and availability of materials, and as a result, the buildings are not made to withstand such an earthquake. Not only that, but because they may have been designed to withstand hurricanes by using concrete roofs, that may have also contributed to more deaths.

(Image Newscom/PTSPhoto from TPM)

A good group to support in their efforts in Haiti: Doctors Without Borders/Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF)

Doctors Without Borders /Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) are a world renowned group working worldwide to provide humanitarian assistance, including Haiti. Even better, they are already in Haiti, which means they can provide assistance as fast as anyone looking for your support in helping Haitians. Based on reports, with the damage that has occurred to hospitals, they are going to need help.

You can find out more about them at the tumblr site I linked to.

And more importantly, you can donate here:

My tips for dealing with procrastination

I was thinking about this this morning as I struggled to get started on something. Here’s some notes on this

  • If you can’t get going on the thing you should be doing, get started on something else. Something you are interested in. Even better if it is something you need to do as well. At least this will get your started and give you momentum. After you have that momentum, you might find that you have enough momentum to move over and start working on the thing you should be doing.
  • Are you tired/hungry/thirty? Sometimes taking care of the basic needs will help get you motivated enough to get started.
  • Take the five minute approach. Say: I am going to work on this for five minutes, then stop. It’s hard to say: I can’t spare five minutes. I find once I do that, it helps me to get going.

Posted via email from Bernie Michalik’s posterous site

More on racism and Avatar

Warning: Avatar spoilers!

It appears that this idea is getting more consideration, Some see racist theme in alien adventure ‘Avatar’ – Yahoo! News. I leave it to you to make your own judgment. I am surprised by comments like this, though:

“Avatar” is being criticized by a small but vocal group of people who allege it contains racist themes — the white hero once again saving the primitive natives.

This comment itself seems wrong to me, since I don’t see anywhere where the Na’vi are “primitive”. If anything, Cameron suggests they are superior to the humans. I also don’t see him “saving” the Na’vi: indeed, at the end, his life is saved by them. There is the idea of the outsider saving the community, but that theme can be seen in many films. But more than that, the forces that rise up to defeat the human military seemed to be so much more than just the human in the mix.

Maybe I am naive, but I thought “Avatar” is richer and more complex than how it is portrayed here.

How to think about privacy: my rough notes after reading Mark Zuckerberg say The Age of Privacy is Over

More and more I hear: privacy is dead, over, finished. Case in point: Facebook’s Zuckerberg Says The Age of Privacy is Over. But is it true? If I think about the arguments for privacy being over, or the arguments against privacy, I get something like this:

Privacy is over because people share so much now: it is true, people do share alot more. But while people do share much more, they may also be sharing more selectively. For example, I find that I share alot more information via the various social media available (e,g, blogging, Facebook), but I am also aware of what I do share and where I share it. For instance, I assume everyone can and might read my blog and as a result, I am very selective of what I share there. Unlike Facebook, there is little personal information there. I do (or did) share more information with family and friends on Facebook. However, when I first used Facebook, the understanding I had — supported by Facebook — was that I would have much more control over who could see my information. However, it appears Facebook is reneging on that understanding. As a result, I am sharing less information on Facebook, and I am planning to share less there, and I am encouraging everyone to be mindful and selective of what they share there. I still like sharing information with people using technology, and there are alot of different sites and tools that allow me to do that and I will continue to do that, but I will strive to do it on my own terms.

This not just true for me and my generation, but younger people as well. When I see teens (like my own) sharing information, they often do it cryptically. (And not just teens.) They may do this for exclusive reasons, but they may also do it in order to maintain privacy. They are exerting their rights to control who gets to see information about them. Just like I do and others do with the privacy controls that they have available to them. People like and need privacy.

Another mistake people make is assuming that behaviors that were once private but no longer are therefore equals/means privacy is dead. It is more likely the case that what was once considered shameful or embarrassing or otherwise detrimental to a person now no longer is. I think sexting is a terrible idea, but if enough young people do it, people will eventually shrug, they way they now shrug at ads for birth control or topless beaches. It won’t be that people don’t value privacy: it will just mean that they don’t think such things needs to be private any longer, and dinosaurs like me can complain all they want about sexting because let’s face it, no one wants to see me with no clothes on anyway. :) (No doubt they will also poke fun at me for paying for music on iTunes, too.)

Privacy is over because technology deprives you of it: why is this true? People do put their privacy at risk by adopting new technologies that they can’t/don’t understand or control. However, they make a deal, explicitly or implicitly, with the organizations that they are sharing that information with, be it a business, the government, or some other organization. If customers think that the banks cannot protect their financial privacy, they are going to find other ways to do financial transactions. Indeed, the offering of enhanced privacy becomes a valuable commodity, and companies that offer it will have a competitive advantage. Likewise, if citizens think that the government cannot protect there personal privacy, they are either going to elect a new government or find ways to not share information with the government. Right now criminals do this as a matter of course. However, if people mistrust their government and feel there privacy is being compromised, everyone may do it as a matter of course.

And if they can’t come to an agreeable arrangement with newer technologies that threaten to take away privacy, people will adopt a number of stances to deal with that. One is to hide your identity. People do this often now. Indeed, most people participating in social media use handles without photos instead of using their real name and image. Another way is to adopt proxies of some sort. Any networking technologies — which will more and more come to mean all technology — are open to the use of proxies. If privacy becomes scarce, than proxies will become valuable.

Finally, people will just avoid, not use or misuse technologies that try to rob them of their privacy. It will be a struggle at first, but privacy is an elemental need of people.

Why do you need privacy? You must have something to hide. That may be true, but anyone who thinks that this is all that privacy is about has a limited understanding of the value of privacy. Privacy is not hiding something you have done wrong. Privacy is about controlling your life on your terms. Privacy is about having sovereignty over your life and what you do with it. To illustrate this, let’s take some simple examples.

You need privacy to control your financial affairs: in the course of your life you have to share financial information about yourself with others (e.g., the government, the bank, your employer). However, in a progressive society, it is in your best interests and the society’s best interest to limit how much of that information you share. If you were not able to keep this information private, than in the worst case, criminals would know that you have valuable property, and they may decide to rob you. If you did not have alot of valuable property, people might discriminate against you based on that fact. (Indeed, that happens now to people whose appearance discloses this fact). And regardless of your financial standing, full disclosure of your financial affairs puts you at a disadvantage in all sorts of business dealings and allows you to be taken advantage of. If you can’t mind your own business, others will do it at your loss.

You need privacy to control your identity: If you are not able to keep things like passwords or other information about yourself private, people could find out this information and either use it against you, or they could engage in identity theft and pass themselves off as you. People can also take information about you and by putting it out of context, use it against you to your disadvantage.

You need privacy to escape social norms: Other than a very limited number of people, most people would not want to have their lives filmed and on display 24 hours a day. For it is not just being on display: it is being judged and acted upon based on what you display. You might have a position in society that expects you to behave a certain way in public. (And it could be as simple as being well groomed, conservative and exceedingly polite.) But when you in your own home, you might want to give that up and be another way, even if that other way is relaxed. Privacy allows you to do that. Maybe you want to wear the same sweatpants from Friday night to Monday morning. Maybe you want to dance around in (what to you is) an embarrassing way to some music few people like. Maybe you want to clean your house in the nude! Whatever the behavior is, privacy allows you to do that.

You need privacy to negotiate difficult situations: Likewise, let’s say there was a disagreement in your family, and some people unfairly insist you do not speak to others in your family. You are caught in the middle of an unfair dispute, and you hope to resolve it by talking to both sides. Privacy allows you to do that. Indeed, to be effective in negotiations, privacy is essential.

You need privacy to prevent or reduce prejudice and discrimination: As a young adult, let’s say your friend posts images of you and your friends out drinking and having fun. They post them on Facebook, but just to your friends, because they don’t want everyone to see them. In other words, they want some degree of privacy regarding this.  However, one of your friends is related to someone who works for the new company you want to work for, and in doing a search on Facebook, is able to see you out partying. Now, you may be a very responsible individual at work, but this person assumes the worst about you because of these pictures and screens you out of the position. This is not really fair, but because of a lack of privacy, you are stuck.

Likewise, let’s say you are socially conservative and you are a strong supporter of right wing parties in the country you live in. You join some groups on Facebook and you express your political opinions there. As it turns out, the new position you want to go work for in your company is managed by someone whose political views are the direct opposite of yours. That person does a search for you in Google and sees some of the things that you have been saying in the Facebook groups and then finds another reason not to take you on in that role, even though you were a very strong candidate.

You need privacy to express yourself fully:
this is again related to norms. Let’s say you wanted to create something that is not harmful, but would be disapproved of by people you normally want to associate with. Maybe you belong to a religious family, but you want to study art and eventually draw nudes. Maybe you want to learn how to become a lawyer, even though your family hates lawyers. And maybe you fell in love with someone who makes you feel more alive than you ever felt before, but you feel constrained from being public with showing this feeling due to censure from others. Privacy again comes to the rescue.

Privacy supports greater equality and greater freedom:
In societies where there is a political imbalance, and one side has power over another and lords it over them, privacy can help restore balance. If one sides tries to unfairly prevent the other from seeking a better education or a better deal or a fairer distribution of power, privacy can provide the cover needed to allow change to occur.

Privacy can be abused, too. People can commit crimes and hypocritically treat people badly away from others. But to throw out privacy because of these things is to throw out the baby to get rid of the bath water. Likewise, people can say giving up privacy can be worth it in order to gain all these new technologies or ways of doing things. But I think we can have both the new things and privacy.

Anyway, if you’ve read to here, thanks. There are, without a doubt, better sources on privacy that will argue a much better case for it than what I have done here. If you know of them, please comment here. But even with my limited arguments, I hope you will think about why privacy is important and why self serving people like Mark Zuckerberg is wrong when he argues that privacy is over. I like Facebook, and I would be happy for it to succeed. But it should do so and respect — and that is the key word: respect — people’s wishes and need or privacy.

Friday Night Music: Save Your Scissors -by City And Colour (Live)

A great live version of this great tune:

YouTube – Save Your Scissors – City And Colour

How to find your Canadian Member in Parliament

It’s easy. Got your postal code? Good, then go here: Find your Member of Parliament using your Postal Code

And tell them to get back to work.

Why women are posting colors on Facebook statuses…

can be understood by going here: Colors on Facebook status

A great tool to help you clean up your hard disk: JDiskReport

Are you running out of space on your hard disk? Have you lost track of what you had and wish you had an easy way to see just what is on your machine and how much space it is using. If so, then you want to get JDiskReport. JDiskReport is a fantastic tool that could do it for you. As the web site explains:

“JDiskReport enables you to understand how much space the files and directories consume on your disk drives, and it helps you find obsolete files and folders.

The tool analyses your disk drives and collects several statistics which you can view as overview charts and details tables.

This is ad-free uncrippled no-charge binary multi-platform software that never expires.”

It’s very powerful and quickly helps you see how you are using — or in my case, wasting — your disk space. After running it I found many GBs of files that I could either delete or move to a removable disk drive. 

I highly recommend this tool.

Start off the New Year by cleaning up your hard disk

I was running disasterously low of disk space. In search of a good / free tool to help me out. I found this: CCleaner. It did a great job, freeing up almost 2 GB of disk space. Whew! If you find yourself in the same predicament, consider this tool.

Want to live in a small house? Know about the restrictions on the land you want to place it

As you can see from this post, Tiny house = affordable house « view from the greg, some communities place a lower limit as to how small a place you can put on property in that district. If your dream is to build a tiny home likes the ones featured at  in such a district,  you might find your dreams and reality don’t match up. So please investigate further before you sink your money into a place.

your.flowingdata + twitter = a good way to help you track your New Year’s Resolutions

You’ve made your New Year’s Resolutions: now it’s time to track them. Well, if you are looking for a good way to track your new year’s resolutions and you already use twitter, I recommend you check out: your.flowingdata / Quick Start Guide. This guide will show you how easy it is to do this using this site. (I am starting to sound like a bad infomercial). For example, if you want to track weight loss or amount of cigarettes cut back on or even the amount of sleep you are getting or the amount of time you exercised, you can track it here in seconds.

It’s a good tool, and it’s been around for awhile. Give it a try. The visualizations will help give you a better sense of your progress. Hey, every little bit helps.

Late night music…Telepopmusik ‘s Just Breathe

YouTube – Telepopmusik – Just Breathe

Why is twitter great? David Carr explains

David Carr points out why he thinks Twitter Will Endure in the It’s a great read, and I found myself agreeing with most of it. (I’ve been using twitter for a little over 2 years now and have over 9000 tweets at this time.) And naturally I found this via @eric_andersen on twitter. (If you are on twitter, follow Eric: you will learn alot!)

Why it pays to read the news from more than one source

In this mildly negative story on the Obamas Hawaiian Trip in the, there is this:

On New Year’s Eve, the Obamas watched “Avatar” in a shopping-mall theater cleared of people. “I must admit that when you close down shopping centers you’re pushing the envelope of the patience that people might have otherwise,” said Hawaii Democratic state senator Clayton Hee.

Now you don’t want to be like Senator Hee or the WSJ, for if you read this: First Family Sees ‘Avatar’ in 3-D – The Caucus Blog –, you’d see:

The Secret Service cleared one of the 10 theaters at the Windward Mall’s multiplex in Kaneohe for the Obamas, who arrived for the special screening around 9:20 a.m., well before the day’s regular showings get underway so as not to inconvenience other moviegoers. The other nine theaters at the multiplex are open as usual.

Note that the only one of the 10 theatres were shutdown and that it was shutdown at 9:20 in the morning! Wow. I can see how that would really push “the envelope of patience” of the millions of people who want to be in THAT theatre at THAT time in the morning.

On the elusiveness of science fiction and art

(Don’t read this if you haven’t seen Avatar).

Ta-Nehisi Coates at the Atlantic highlights an idea that has come up with regards to Avatar (Avatar As Dances With Wolves – Ta-Nehisi Coates). The idea centers around one of the “white guy goes native” and talks about how this comes up in Avatar and Dances With Wolves. I’ve also seen it come up in discussions around “District 9″.

It’s odd to me, because while I can see how Cameron borrowed from the Western genre, by placing the film in the future and by borrowing images from other genres and events, he dilutes the ability of someone to say that the protagonist represents white Europeans. If anything, when the great tree is destroyed, I thought of the Na’vi as being New Yorkers and the great tree being the World Trade Towers. (The parallels in the imagery is strong.) So are the Na’vi a) native peoples, or b)  New Yorkers or c) something unique?

I  think they are something unique. I think Cameron is drawing from a number of sources in order to tell his story. That’s one of the great benefits of the SF genre, and one of the freedoms that artists have generally. Likewise for the director of District 9, Neil Blomkamp. With SF, you can break free of history and current events to examine ideas the way you would like to explore them. They can help shed light on history or current events, but there is as much divergence as there is convergence. Likewise, as an artist, you can make things up, and as an artist working in SF, you can make things up even more. (Though even SF has it’s limits). The audience is free to interpret your work as they will. But  that also means that people can agree and disagree about the intent of the work and the creator. That is the wonderful thing about the elusiveness of science fiction and art.