Interesting. This video, YouTube – I AM A MUSLIM!,
is an awful lot like this video in format: YouTube – I Am Canadian
Interesting. This video, YouTube – I AM A MUSLIM!,
is an awful lot like this video in format: YouTube – I Am Canadian
To me this video should not even have to be made, but given that some people have poor, preconceived notions about Muslims, I hope this video can go some way to dispel fear and prejudice.
That sounds like a stretch, but as I watched this video on the packaging of her new CD, I was struck by a number of things:
Who knew Katy Perry could be such an innovator? I am already looking forward to a re-release of that classic Spinal Tap epic: Smell The Glove.
I was not surprised. You might be. See How panhandlers use free credit cards – thestar.com
The actual title of the blog post that I am commenting on is 60 Things to Be Grateful For In Life at the site tinybuddha.com. However, the word “grateful” implies you are grateful towards someone or something. I prefer the word “appreciate”, not only because it does away with that relationship, but it has connotations of “growth” and “value”. Appreciating your sense of sight implies not only do you value your ability to see the beauty in the world, but also you are growing your ability to see the beauty in the world. I like that better.
Regardless of whether you are grateful, appreciative, or both, check out the list. It’s a good one.

The Guardian has an interview with the great Usain Bolt.
Unlike alot of sports interviews, in this one Bolt talks openly and casually about himself, his competition, and his goals. Barring injury, Bolt will be one of the greatest runners of all time. He has great style, too, as can be seen from the way he races AND from the way he dresses here.
Check out the article: it’s worthwhile.
Spiegel has a good interview with Günter Grass on his upcoming book – which sounds great – and gets his thoughts on a number of other topics. This one, for example, on writing:
Grass: I would like to put a stop to this movement toward reading on computers, but it seems that nobody can do this. Nevertheless, the drawbacks of the electronic process are already apparent during the writing of the manuscript. Most young authors write directly on their computers, and then edit and work in their files. In my case, on the other hand, there are many preliminary steps: a handwritten version, two that I’ve typed myself on my Olivetti typewriter and, finally, several copies of versions that my secretary has input into the computer and printed out, and into which I’ve incorporated many handwritten corrections. These steps are lost when you write directly on the computer.
SPIEGEL: Don’t you feel old-fashioned with your Olivetti?
Grass: No. On the computer, a text always looks somehow finished, even if it’s far from it. That’s tempting. I usually write the first, handwritten version all at once, and when there’s something I don’t like I leave a blank space. I fill these gaps in the Olivetti version, and because of that thoroughness, the text also acquires a certain long-windedness. In the ensuing versions, I try to combine the originality of the first version with the accuracy of the second one. With this slow approach, there’s less of a risk of slickness and arbitrariness creeping in.
The interview is worth a read and can be found here: SPIEGEL Interview with Günter Grass: ‘The Nobel Prize Doesn’t Inhibit Me in My Writing’ – SPIEGEL ONLINE – News – International
I came across the audiotool web site serendipitously today. I’m delighted I did, for it’s an incredible web site. What Audiotool does is allow you to virtually play with a number of classic electronic devices like 909s and 303s from to make your own electronic music, well, like this: August 27 by blm849 – Audiotool. In a very short time, I learned how to wire up the configuration below to make this piece of music. It looks complicated, but it was actually pretty simple. And alot of fun. With practice and inspiration, I think anyone could make some really interesting music with this site. What’s even better, the music can be downloaded by anyone as an MP3 file, so you can take it and play it on your favourite portable music device.
Kodak ended it’s famous Kodachrome film in 2009, after making it for 74 years. Here’s a video of some of the earliest uses of it, from 1922:
To give you some perspective, here is a List of American films of 1922 from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. As you can see, at that time the main actors were Valentino, Buster Keaton, and Mary Pickford. We’re talking the very early days of film: black and white and silent. That makes this video all the more remarkable.
(Found at kottke.org)
So says Dan Pallotta at Harvard Business Review online. And he’s right. Too many people I know stress about things at work, instead of producing value. If you are providing me with a service, I don’t know if you provided it while singing a happy tune or were miserable the whole time, worried I wouldn’t like it. I would prefer you were happy about doing it, but what I am mainly concerned about is that you provide good service. Most people are that way, including the people you work for. So do good work, but being miserable about it is optional and in fact likely results in worse work, which we all do care about.
Great news. Penguin has joined up with the Global Fund to help eliminate AIDS in Africa by participating in the (RED) program. They have a smart selection of classics such as “Sense and Sensibility” and “Dracula” and 50% of the profits from each book goes to (RED). The books look great, and no doubt will be up to Penguins’ high standard of printing. I think if you wanted to get someone younger interested in these books, this would be a great way to do it. Not to mention these would look great on your bookshelf. What are you waiting for? 🙂 See Penguin Classics RED editions – Penguin RED Classics for more information

I was excited last night to try out the CBC (Canadian Broadcast Corporation – The Canadian version of the BBC) Radio iPhone App last night for a few reasons: it is free, it has a nice user interface, and it provides access to a wide radio of programs on CBC. I especially like the jazz and classical music on Radio 2, not to mention the indie pop on radio 3. It was all excellent. But the other thing I liked about it, the back to the future part, was that I was able to lie in bed and listen to the “radio”, just like I did when I was a kid. Now it is a iPod instead of a transitor radio that I had turned low so my parents couldn’t hear, but the joy of listening to late night music is still the same.
For more on this great app — and it is not just limited to Canadians — you can go here: CBC.ca – CBC Mobile Services – iPhone. And if you like other forms of music, or very intelligent talk radio, I highly recommend this.
The site Wine of the Weekend has a great description of a delicious wine that is also great value (which is not surprising given it is part of the Fuzion line of wines). It is a superb summer wine, great for sipping by itself or paired with many dishes found in fusion cooking. Pinot Grigio fans should note, however, that is has alot of flavour, including “opulent peach, pear and citrus flavours on the palate”/ I love it, but fans of very subtle wines might find it too much.
See Wine of the Weekend for more information.
Oh, and the price: $8.95 at the LCBO in Ontario.
There’s some confusion that people have about free speech that Linda Holmes at NPR clears up nicely in one sentence
Because the “free” … means “free from government interference,” not “free from consequences.”
The rest of the article is worth a read. Meanwhile, the next time you hear someone complain about their right to free speech being trampled upon, ask who is portrayed as doing the trampling.
This page at Wikipedia, Hijab by country, will tell you not only what the rules are for wearing this garment in many countries around the world, but it explains the difference between various form of Islamic dress. As you can see, the rules and the beliefs about this garment vary widely from country to country, not just in predominantly Christian countries, but in predominantly Muslim countries too. It is – pardon the pun – a very revelling page.
Do you recognize this guitarist? In this video she does a cover of i’m yours” by Jason Mraz. It’s a good cover for sure, and it has almost 6 million views. Six million.
Here’snother version of that song.
Speaking of that song, here’s the incredibly good cover of Hey Ya by Mat Weddle of Obadiah Parker.
Now these people aren’t famous in the way Jason Mraz is or Outkast or the Beatles or whomever else they are covering. Yet they are able to attract large audiences with little more than a camera and an instrument. They don’t have promoters or producers or other talent helping with their songs. They are just simply singing for us, and getting alot of us to listen.
It likely helps that they are singing songs that are very popular. If they were singing an obscure song, it’s not as likely people would find them via YouTube as easily. I think one of the reasons they do get an audience is that people want to hear people singing songs they like. Stiill, I think that they would surface even without singing popular songs, either through tagging or other sharing mechanisms. YouTube is a platform that allows people to do that, much like radio was a way for bands to reach audiences that they could never reach simply by playing only in music halls. What people find interesting will rise to the top most of the time.
These artists might not get fortune this way. but it has never been easier in some ways to get a slice of fame. It reminds me of punk rock or the beginning of rock n roll, in that young people were just going out and performing and there was a willing audience to watch them. I think it is exciting and encouraging to anyone who wants to perform for an audience. You just need a camera, a good song, a good voice, and possibly one other instrument. The Hall, so to speak, is packed with millions of people, waiting for you to start.
BTW, I brought up the unstoppable force of social media on music because the music industry has been fighting for so many years to prevent people from taking over the music industry and making it their own. First there was file shariing, where you had listeners cutting out distribution of music. Now you have social music, where by the listeners cut out the promotion of music. There will still be that traditional way of making music of course, but that territory is going to shrink more and more as time goes by and the unstoppable force of social media on music keeps rolling on.
One indicaton of a great song is how well it can be remade by differenc artists, each time being something different and great in its own way. I think “Wichita Lineman” is one of those songs.
Now you may think: “that old Glen Campbell song?! Are you nuts?!” Hey, it’s a great song. It is wonderfully melodic, with evocative lyrics that flow from one verse to another.
But don’t take my word for it. Check out this version by REM
This reggae like version from Dennis Brown
This lush version by Cassandra Wilson
And finally here’s Glen Campbell, in 2008, no less, rocking it out
I like the contradiction in some of the videos of M.I.A. like XXXO, Boyz, and to some extent, Galang. All three deploy a hyper visual style and are highly produced. But they do that using visual elements that are simple or kitchy. You feel like you are seeing something unlike what you would see in any other video. Not all her videos are that way. Paper Planes and Sunshowers are much more straightforward videos and not unlike what you would see for alot of big music groups. But those three videos are meant to visually overwhelm you, much the way her clothes do. It’s not for everyone, but I like it.
Here’s the ultra-kitsch of XXXO
Here’s the low-tech graphics of Boyz
And here’s the graffiti animation of Galang
Back in 2002, when CBS ran this story, 7% of Americans still believed Elvis was alive, despite his death 25 years earlier. (“The King’s” Popularity Constant – CBS News).
This has led me to conclude that for any poll, there will be a margin of people — the Elvis Presley margin — who will agree with anything (or disagree with anything) that the pollster asks.
I thought of this because of 18% of Americans believe President Obama is a Muslim, despite everything that says he is a Christian. 18% is well above the Elvis Presley margin, which leads me to believe that there are people who should know better that still think this. Interesting.
Yahoo/AP has a good run down on some of the statements that have been made about the Park 51 Community Center (“the Ground Zero Mosque”). Well worth a read, whatever you position is on the topic. See FACT CHECK: Islam already part of WTC neighborhood – Yahoo! News
According to Wikipedia, it says this:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.[1]
I can’t understand how people can say that the Constitution is of supreme importance, but there should be restrictions on where mosques are built. I can understand people who don’t respect the Constitution saying that, but not those that do.
I am going to start to track this. A number of statements Eric Schmidt, the CEO of Google, has said recently that are just dumb. For example, this one: Google CEO Suggests You Change Your Name to Escape His Permanent Record. Yes folks, Google shouldn’t have to change anything. The onus is on YOU to change your name to make a break from your past. I don’t even feel like arguing this, it is such a dumb idea.
Here’s my prediction: Eric Schmidt will be out of a job in three years, and Google will be on the decline. But in the meantime, if you feel like talking his ideas seriously, by all means go to this article.
I think Schmidt should focus on other things, like why Google, which apparently has all these smart people with lots of spare time to come up with new ideas, keep coming out with such duds instead.
Quite a few, based on this: Mosques near Manhattan, NY – Google Maps. If you click on the link, you can get more detail on them, as well as where there are located.
Google puts it at 11, but I suspect there may be more, based on some other maps I have seen.

This is an amazing map outlining the night life of Harlem in the 1930s, with some legendary names and locations. It’s a fascinating view into the social circuit at the time, filled with little details (e.g. whom to ask for when you get to a certain club). For more on it, see:
476 – “Go late!”: A Night-Club Map of Harlem | Strange Maps | Big Think
The blog History Eraser Button has a run down of the area where the Park 51 Community Center (the so-called Ground Zero Mosque) is going. If you have an opinion of this, one way or another, and you don’t know what that section of Manhattan looks like, take a look at “Hallowed Ground” | History Eraser Button. You may not change your mind, but if you think that section of New York is some form of holy place, well, take a look.
I’ve been to New York many times, and to me, it looks like alot of working New York. Nothing wrong with that. If anything, it has that rough charm I love about the city, just like I love the people who live there. New York is a great city: to me, it’s the capital city of the world. Any city so great should be open to everyone, as New York has been these many many years. It’s one of the reasons, among many, why it is so great.
Long live New York City.
![]()
The family film is ascendent. Pixar and Dreamworks Animation are very successful in creating works to appeal to all ages. And a synopsis of this rise can be seen in this article: Is a multiplex full of family films the future of moviegoing? | 24 Frames | Los Angeles Times.
To me, it is something I had been expecting for over a decade. I remember taking my daughter to see Madeline (1998) and thinking: there should be more movies to take my kid to, but there wasn’t. After all, every kid film brings in at least two people, and there will likely be snacks, too. And then there are the DVD rentals, the toys, etc. Lots of ways to make money in a way you can’t with other types of film. Indeed, now we have 3D movies (that charge more) that will drive sales of 3D entertainment centers all home. All that show business driven by kids movies.
It looks like Hollywood finally figured it out. Now there are LOTS of fims for families and kids, as the article shows. And for now, it looks like this will continue to increase. Will it increase until most films are family films? Will parents stop taking their kids to movies? It will depend how greedy the movie business gets. It’s still an affordable form of activity to participate in with your kids, but if that were to change, parents might forgo going to the cinema for some other form of cheaper entertainment.
Time has not been good for the movie business. It’s lasted alot longer than vaudeville, but if vaudeville is any lesson to the movies (or radio or even TV), it’s that nothing is guaranteed to last forever. Sad for me to say, not even the cinema.
(Link to the lamp icon comes from the Pixar Corporate Overview page. )
THIS is a brilliant video. First off, the animation itself is remarkable. Secondly the talk itself, by Philip Zimbardo is fascinating. He explores how people think about time affects the way they live and how well they do in life. He generalizes that people tend to be past, present or future oriented, and that makes a big difference in terms of your behavoir and outlook on life.
But don’t read me: watch (and read) the video
And check out more videos from RSA Animate on Youtube
| "Lucile Dorsey" <triflerwnxk6@recael.com>
08/13/2010 09:35 AM |
|
This combination of Firefox, Greasemonkey and the Super Kiwi cloak script is a great way for me to avoid those sites that eat into my productive time while at work. If you are comfortable installing a tool like GreaseMonkey in your Firefox browser, I recommend you do so and get the Super Kiwi cloak script. I think Super Kiwi works a bit better than the Invisibility Cloak script, at least for me.
For more info, see Stop procrastination on the internet – Konrad Voelkel’s Blog r Geek to Live: Ban time-wasting web sites. Or comment here and I will see how I can help.
Now there are many ways to think about this. For example, this could be drawn in terms of percentages, but even then, the dramatic difference in the higher income range would likely not go away.
Taken from Ezra Klein – The Bush tax plan vs. the Obama tax plan in one chart

How? by doing this: Pledge to do some GREEN for your community with STARBUCKS and EVERGREEN
It’s easy. And it is likely something you are doing or would want to do. Why not treat yourself (or a friend) to a free coffee.
Thanks to Starbucks and Evergreen for supporting this.
The secret of success, I think, is well summed up by Woody Allen in this quote taken from an interview of Woody Allen on Stardust Memories:
I make so many films, that I don’t care about individual successes and failures. I made Interiors and I made Stardust Memories, and before they came out I was working on something else. The film could be a big hit like Manhattan or Hannah, to me it doesn’t matter. I’ve tried very hard to make my films into a non-event. I just want to work, that’s all. Just put the film out for people to see, just keep grinding them out. I hope I’ll have a long and healthy life, that I can keep working all the time, and that I can look back in old age and say, ‘I made fifty movies and some of them were excellent and some of them were not so good and some were funny…’ I just don’t want to get into that situation that so many of my contemporaries are in, where they make one film every few years and it’s a Big Event. That’s why I’ve always admired Bergman. He’d be working quietly on the island and would make a little tiny film and put it out, and then he’d be working on the next one. You know, the work was important. Not the eventual success or failure, the money or the critical reception. What’s important is that your work is part of your daily life and you can lice decently. You can , as in my case, do the other things I want to do at the same time. I like to play music, I like to see my children, I like to go to restaurants, I like to take walks and watch sports and things. When you’re working at the same time, you have a nice, integrated life.
This nicely incorporates a number of guidelines to success that I’ve heard in the past, such as:
Thanks to the blog Letter to Jane for this.
I can understand that to a certain degree. I can’t say I am a skydiver or a
cook or a manager if I have never practiced any of those skills. But let’s
say that I have. Let’s say that I have made many a meal at home: Am I a
cook?
I would argue that am I, based on the spectrum view of skills. Every role
has skills associated with it. Those skills have varying degrees of
difficulty in acquiring. Some skills can be picked up right away. Others
take years to learn, if one ever learns them at all. You may learn enough
about cooking to feed you and your family. To me, that makes you a cook.
You may not be a professional cook nor one of the best chefs in the world,
but that should not exclude you from thinking you are a cook. Same hold
true for a lot of other roles.
Now you should not think that just because you are a cook or a writer or an
amateur carpenter that you are equivalent to everyone else who calls
themselves a cook. You are on one end of the spectrum, and they are on the
other end. However, with hard work, talent and luck, you can progress along
the dpectrum from one end to the other.
One thing I like about marathon running is that it is very supportive of
this idea. If you are fit enough to finish a marathon and you enter a big
city marathon like New York or London, you will be a) in the same race as
the best runners in the world and b) you will be considered a marathon
runner. People will support you and encourage you to do better. No one will
say: you aren’t in the top finishers so you aren’t a marathon runner.
Runners generally are supportive and inclusive of runners of all types. I
wish all professions were like this.
In the oriental martial arts, it was mostly the case that you were either a
white belt or a black belt. It was polar: you either were a black belt or
you weren’t. This gave way, at least in North America, to coloured belts:
yellow, green, brown, etc. This is more of the spectrum approach to skills,
and encouraged students not to give up by showing their progress as they
made their way from white to black belt.
I think it is important for people when they are starting out in acquiring
skills that they believe that they can acquire skills and that they can be
a carpenter or a cook or a writer or a computer programmer, and that even
if they are not the best in the role that they have chosen, that they still
can consider themselves to have the necessary skills to be that role an
do.worthwhile work. There is a place on the spectrum from the barely
knowledgeable to the elite, and by encouraging more people to think that
way, the overall contribution to society will be much greater than if we
have just a few practioners.
I think the polar approach discourages people from taking up certain
skills. I also believe that people are less supportive of the spectrum
approaches when it is hard to discern one person from another. Why don’t
the best marathon runners worry about being compared to me? It’s because
they can finish a marathon in just over 2 hours and I cannot. But with hard
work and some luck, I could get closer to them.
Thanks for reading this, and thanks very much if you have any comments.
—————–
Sent from my BlackBerry Handheld.
Have you ever thought it would be great to produce a film or a play or other work of art? If you thought it would require alot of your own money, think again. Kickstarter provides a way to pool money from various smaller sponsors to fund a bigger project. It’s a great idea, and you can learn more about it here at their Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ):
Kickstarter is a new way to fund creative ideas and ambitious endeavors.
We believe that…
• A good idea, communicated well, can spread fast and wide.
• A large group of people can be a tremendous source of money and encouragement.Kickstarter is powered by a unique all-or-nothing funding method where projects must be fully-funded or no money changes hands.
Top ↑
All-or-nothing funding?Every Kickstarter project must be fully funded before its time expires or no money changes hands.
Why?
1. It’s less risk for everyone. If you need $5,000, it’s tough having $2,000 and a bunch of people expecting you to complete a $5,000 project.
2. It allows people to test concepts (or conditionally sell stuff) without risk. If you don’t receive the support you want, you’re not compelled to follow through. This is huge!
3. It motivates. If people want to see a project come to life, they’re going to spread the word.
For more on it, go to the site.
Simple. See this room:
Most of the things in this room are low cost: shelves, stools, rug, fridge. The overall impression is greater because it is all white.
From 2 or 3 things i know