Remembering when the (world wide) Web was fun (and how it still is)

It seems like a century ago, but when the web (or WWW for world wide web)  first started in the 90s, web sites were fun. There were no standards and very few rules, which meant people were free to do what they wanted within the restrictions that HTML and web servers put on them. As a result, you never knew what you might get when you first went to a new URL. And if you followed sites that highlighted other noteworthy sites, you were sure to find something cool or fun or even mind-blowing.

Nowadays, most web sites are anything but that. Informative, yes. Useful, mostly. But fun, rarely.

If you yearn for fun web sites again, I’d like to point you to this site: Tiny Awards. That particular page shows you the sites up for the honour of Best Tiny Web Site for 2026. These listed sites might not be informative or useful, but they are fun. Better still, the finalists and winners for previous years are down at the bottom of that page. So you have plenty of fun sites to browse.

Check out Tiny Awards and all the sites listed. Also consider digging around. I noticed one site had a URL of https://neal.fun/cursor-camp/ so out of curiosity I went to https://neal.fun and much to my delight I found out that Neal has plenty more fun sites.

Enjoy. Have fun!

P.S. I was reminded again of how in the beginning, all websites started with www (e.g. http://www.cnn.com). This made sense at the time from a technical point of view. Also sometimes people would enter http://www.siteabc.com:80 to tell the server you wanted to get information from port 80. These days most servers send information over port 443 and don’t need the www any more. The things you forget!

Running light without overbyte: lightweight web sites are a good way of getting caught up quickly without the bloat of video, javascript and more (less is more)

Once upon a time, web sites were simple. Now they are complicated and sometimes bloated. Just go to the web site of news organizations like CNN or the New York Times and you will know what I mean.

But there is a way to avoid that. Just go to the light/lite versions of their web sites. This is lite CNN. This is a lighter New York Times (TimesWire) And here is an aggregator site that does something similar for a number of topics, like tech: The Brutalist Report – tech.

If you want to find more sites like that, check out: A List Of Text-Only & Minimalist News Sites at GreyCoder.

Kudos to companies that build lightweight versions of their web sites. Not everyone has high speed Internet connectivity. And not everyone needs lots and lots of information. Keeping it simple is cool.

(The title is an extract of the original title for the computer magazine, Dr. Dobbs Journal. It’s original title was: dr. dobb’s journal of Tiny BASIC Calisthenics & Orthodontia (with the subtitle Running Light Without Overbyte))

On Microsoft Frontpage: a history not just of a product, but the early days of the web

Microsoft Front Page

I found this piece on Microsoft FrontPage fascinating.  I remember when it first came out: it was a great tool if you wanted to develop for the web. While serious people went with Adobe products, FrontPage made developing web page easier for the rest of us. If you want to learn about the early days of the Web, or if you want to see what well designed software looks like (even if it seems very clunky with that Windows XP interfact), I recommend you read it.

You can actually still download it, here. Now should you? No. Read the sections of the article subtitled “Bad” and “Ugly” to see why.